Through Terminating a Harsh Conservative Welfare Policy, This Budget Clearly Sets Out How the Labour Party Will Wage the Battle to Renew Britain
Just recently, the finance minister, Rachel Reeves, presented a Labour budget. People have been calling for Labour’s purpose and principles to be more distinctly articulated. Through the decisions made – a shift to a more equitable tax system, focusing on wealth to pay for tackling child poverty, good public services and the cost of living – we have clearly demonstrated what we stand for.
That’s why Labour MPs cheered in the Commons, and it’s why we are ready for the fights to come. And it’s why the cries from the right began right away.
The Central Political Divide in UK Government
The central dividing line in British politics is yet again on the economy. On the one hand Labour, who aim to reform it so it benefits everyday working people, and on the opposite side, our political opponents, who favor the current system and the failed ideology of the past. We must now take on, and win, the debate.
The Tories were given 14 years to resolve things and instead, by any measure, they got much worse. Their ideological austerity and trickle-down economics – tax cuts for the wealthy, reducing investment (leaving us with low productivity and wages), and failing to support young people post-Covid – didn’t work.
Legacy of Decline Under the Former Government
Living standards dropped by the largest margin since records began, child poverty reached record levels, NHS waiting lists in England were the highest on record, wages remained flat, a housing crisis took hold, young people scarred by Covid were abandoned. The history of failure continues.
One budget alone can’t fix everything, so Labour has a comprehensive plan for renewal and for rewiring the country. And we have to go out and continue making the case for why our strategy will yield benefits.
Social Security and Youth Deprivation
Under the Tories, welfare spending significantly increased. As did child poverty, because they didn’t address the underlying issues: low pay, high housing costs, deep inequalities in education, health and regions. The state ends up paying more to manage the effects instead of the cure.
It’s why we are building more social housing than for a generation, raising wages and enhanced protections for workers, greatly increasing investment in infrastructure and new industries, getting waiting lists down and lowering the costs of childcare and energy as we drive for clean power.
Ending the Two-Child Benefit Cap
It’s also why we are absolutely right to use this budget to lift the two-child benefit cap.
For almost a decade, since it was introduced, low-income families with children have endured from a unjust social experiment that was branded as fair for working people when it was anything but. Most of the families impacted by it have a parent in work.
It’s done nothing but push 300,000 more children into poverty – which, in the end, costs us more, as well as being callous and immoral.
Real Impact in Communities
From experience from my own constituency – where over 5,000 children will be raised out of poverty as a result of ending the cap – the actual impact it’s had. Children wearing low-cost wellies as school shoes, children going to bed without food and cold, living in cramped, mouldy homes, parents during the holidays relying on food banks for a simple meal or small gift for their kids.
I also see the impact on schools, teachers, social workers, doctors and charities who are already overburdened but have to redirect time and resources to supporting children who are living with the consequences of deep poverty.
Lasting Consequences of Child Poverty
Just one in four pupils from the poorest families achieve five good GCSEs, compared with nearly three in four among affluent families. This predisposes them for the challenges they face during their lives: missed potential, financial struggles and ill health. Children who were raised in poverty are more likely to be unemployed or poor as adults.
Addressing child poverty isn’t just a ethical duty, it is a future-oriented strategy. Poverty costs the economy significantly more than the £3bn cost of lifting the two-child cap, or expanding free school meals.
This is the reason we acted urgently in the budget, despite the very difficult economic context. Every day with this cap in place sees more than 100 extra children pushed into poverty. The effects of lifting it won’t happen overnight either, so taking early action in the parliament was crucial.
The cap was a totem to 14 years of failed conservative ideology. Now it is gone.
Equitable Funding for Measures
We, as Labour, can also be clear that these measures are being paid for in a fair way – from a new gambling levy, closing tax loopholes and a new “mansion tax”.
Final Thoughts
Equity and direction – that’s how we will win the battle of ideas. This budget is a clear statement that we won the election as Labour, and will lead as Labour. As I repeatedly said during my campaign to become deputy leader, we must seize back the political platform and set the agenda more strongly about what’s really wrong with the country and how we are fixing it. We’ve certainly done that this week.
So let’s keep hold of it and prevail in this fight about how we will renew Britain and address the deep inequalities impeding progress.